Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections
Back to Search
NALDC Record Details:
Contrasting Nutrient Mitigation and Denitrification Potential of Agricultural Drainage Environments with Different Emergent Aquatic Macrophytes
Download [PDF File]
Remediation of excess nitrogen (N) in agricultural runoff can be enhanced by establishing wetland vegetation but the role of denitrification in N removal is not well understood in drainage ditches. We quantified differences in N retention during experimental runoff events followed by stagnant periods in mesocosms planted in three different vegetation treatments: unvegetated; cutgrass (Leersia orizoides (L.) Sw.); and common cattail (Typha latifolia L.). We also quantified denitrification rates using membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) from intact cores extracted from each mesocosm treatment. All treatments retained 60% or more of NO(3)(-)-N loads during the 6 h experimental runoff event, but mesocosms planted with cutgrass had significantly higher (68%) retention compared to cattail (60%) or unvegetated (61%) treatments. After the runoff event, mesocosms planted in cattails reduced NO3--N concentrations by > 95% within 24 h and cutgrass achieved similar reductions within 48 h, whereas reductions in unvegetated mesocosms were significantly less (65%). Cores from cutgrass mesocosms had significantly higher average denitrification rates (5.93 mg m(-2) h(-1)) accounting for as much as 56% of the immobilized NO(3)(-)-N within 48 h, whereas denitrification rates were minimal in cores from unvegetated (-0.19 mg m(-2) h(-1)) or cattail (0.2 mg m(-2) h(-1)) mesocosms. Our findings have implications for mitigating excess NO(3)(-)-N in agricultural runoff. While vegetated treatments removed excess NO(3)(-)-N from the water column at similar and significantly higher rates than unvegetated treatments, the high denitrification rates observed for cutgrass highlight the potential for permanent removal of excess N from agricultural runoff in vegetated ditches and wetlands.
Jason M. Taylor
Matthew T. Moore
J. Thad Scott
USDA Scientist Submission
Journal of environmental quality 2015 Jun. 12 v.44 no.4
Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Agricultural Research Service
Web Policies and Important Links