U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NALDC

Main content area

Search

90  Search Results

Number of results to display per page

Search Results

Thumbnail

1. "No-till" farming is a growing practice (id:45280)

Thumbnail

2. Exploring quarterly agricultural survey questionnaire version reduction scenarios (id:42187)

Thumbnail

3. Using previously reported cropland acreage in data collection (id:32708)

Thumbnail

4. Who makes mistakes? : Using data mining techniques to analyze reporting errors in total acres operated (id:41998)

Thumbnail

5. Categorizing nonresponse in Phase III of the 2006 Agricultural Resource Management Survey in Washington State (id:43571)

Thumbnail

6. Categorizing nonresponse occurring in the 2007 June area survey (California, Kansas, New York, Virginia, and Washington) (id:43342)

Thumbnail

7. Assessing the effect of calibration on nonresponse bias in the 2005 ARMS phase III sample using 2002 census of agriculture data (id:43570)

Thumbnail

8. Assessing the effect of calibration on nonresponse bias in the 2006 ARMS phase III sample using census 2002 data (id:21033)

Thumbnail

9. Nonresponse in phase III of the Agricultural Resource Management Survey in Louisiana (id:21034)

Thumbnail

10. Pre-recorded telephone messages as an alternative to follow-up survey reminder postcards II : the effectiveness of automated telephone reminder messages used during the 2007 Pennsylvania County Estimates Survey (id:21037)

Thumbnail

11. Comparison of methods for estimating crop yield at the county level (id:43569)

Thumbnail

12. Supplemental samples for the 2007 area frame : a design for estimating numbers of NML farms for the 2007 Census of Agriculture (id:20949)

Thumbnail

13. Using handheld global positioning system receivers for the June area survey (id:43568)

Thumbnail

14. Using handheld global positioning system receivers for the wheat objective yield survey (id:42001)

Thumbnail

15. Using personal digital assistants for the 2004 Cotton Objective Yield survey (id:43583)

Thumbnail

16. Using handheld global positioning system receivers for Phase II of the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (id:43527)

Thumbnail

17. Modeling NML using the area frame survey (id:55332)

Thumbnail

18. Measuring the economic impact of cooperatives : results from Wisconsin (id:20701)

Thumbnail

19. Measuring the economic impact of cooperatives in Minnesota (id:20704)

Thumbnail

20. Adoption of agricultural production practices : lessons learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project (id:38367)

Thumbnail

21. Survey burden and its impact on attitudes toward the survey sponsor (id:38265)

Thumbnail

22. Developing a state-of-the-art editing and imputation system for NASS' agricultural censuses and sample surveys (id:29365)

Thumbnail

23. Evaluation of the AGGIES automated edit and imputation system (id:33405)

Thumbnail

24. Redrawing the 1994 farm costs and returns survey list frame sample to reduce its overlap with the 1993 FCRS and three other major 1994 surveys (id:55323)

Thumbnail

25. Montana reservation land and Native American agricultural survey results (id:43190)

Thumbnail

26. Redrawing the 1993 farm costs and returns survey list frame sample to reduce its overlap with the 1992 FCRS and three other major 1993 surveys (id:47472)

Thumbnail

27. Results of the December 1993 acreage reconciliation study (id:43188)

Thumbnail

28. An analysis of the cognitive aspects of the January 1993 cattle on feed survey quality assessment (id:47376)

Thumbnail

29. History and procedures of objective yield surveys in the United States (id:30187)

Thumbnail

30. Ranking the states for area frame development (id:46107)

Thumbnail

31. Evaluation of the crop imputation procedures for the Quarterly Agricultural Survey (id:22171)

Thumbnail

32. Identifying and classifying reasons for nonresponse on the 1991 farm costs and returns survey (id:43202)

Thumbnail

33. June 1990 reinterview survey (id:43252)

Thumbnail

34. Analysis of response errors in the December 1988 and December 1989 quarterly agricultural survey data (id:43352)

Thumbnail

35. Evaluation of estimation options for the monthly farm labor survey (id:22172)

Thumbnail

36. June 1990 reinterview survey (id:43212)

Thumbnail

37. Mobile computerized data entry and edit for the livestock prices received survey (id:43261)

Thumbnail

38. Evaluation of a menu approach to CATI and the use of historical data : 1987 December agricultural survey (id:43193)

Thumbnail

39. Identifying and classifying reasons for nonresponse on the 1990 farm costs and returns survey (id:43205)

Thumbnail

40. Response bias in the quarterly agricultural survey crop acreage data : December 1988 and 1989 (id:43271)

Thumbnail

41. A review of the nonoverlap component of the June 1990 multiple frame indications (id:42793)

Thumbnail

42. A review and evaluation of unusual outlier component detection and robust estimation procedures used by the December 1989 Hog Board (id:31943)

Thumbnail

43. Mathematical formulae for the 1989 survey processing system (SPS) summary (id:43204)

Thumbnail

44. Integrated agricultural surveys (id:43203)

Thumbnail

45. Agricultural surveys and technology (id:47405)

Thumbnail

46. A preliminary look at a national area sample allocation (id:31903)

Thumbnail

47. The scope and effect of imputation in quarterly agricultural surveys (id:46102)

Thumbnail

48. Area frame design for agricultural surveys (id:23758)

Thumbnail

49. The quarterly agricultural surveys (id:46049)

Thumbnail

50. Examination of the effect of the respondent and collection method on survey results (id:43458)