Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections

You searched for:

Subjects income Remove constraint income: income Series Rural development perspectives. Remove constraint Rural development perspectives.: Rural development perspectives.
Displaying items 1 - 10 of 11 start over

1. Employment growth in rural services depends on goods-producing industries.

Author:
Bluestone, H. , Miller, J.P.
Subject:
employment , manufacturing , income , economic development , United States
Physical description:
p. 14-17.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives : Feb 1988. v. 4 (2)

2. Increases in rural income may not help smalltown retailers.

Author:
Henderson, D.A. , Hines, F.K.
Subject:
rural communities , retail marketing , consumer expenditure , income , Minnesota
Physical description:
p. 31-36.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives : June/Sept 1990. v. 6 (3)

3. Poverty among rural workers.

Author:
Morrissey, E.S.
Subject:
families , poverty , rural areas , employment , income
Physical description:
p. 37-42.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives : June/Sept 1990. v. 6 (3)

4. Real incomes of rural Black and Hispanic workers fell further behind in the 1980's.

Author:
Lyson, T.A.
Subject:
Blacks , Hispanics , rural areas , minorities , employment opportunities , economic recovery , Whites , income , Southeastern United States
Physical description:
p. 7-11.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives : Feb/May 1991. v. 7 (2)

5. Retirees as a growth industry.

Author:
Summers, G.F. , Hirschl, T.A.
Subject:
rural development , investment , rural communities , capital , income
Physical description:
p. 13-16.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Feb 1985. v. 1 (2)

6. Retirement: a growing part of rural economies.

Author:
Kuehn, J.A.
Subject:
rural areas , population growth , income
Physical description:
p. 36-37.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Feb 1986. v. 2 (2)

7. Rural elderly in demographic perspective.

Author:
Glasgow, N. , Beale, C.L.
Subject:
Health and Pathology , elderly , rural areas , poverty , housing , income
Physical description:
p. 22-26.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Oct 1985. v. 2 (1)

8. The elderly's income and rural development: some cautions.

Author:
Hoppe, R.A.
Subject:
elderly , rural development , governmental programs and projects , poverty , income
Physical description:
p. 27-32.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives : Feb/May 1991. v. 7 (2)

9. What is the payoff for diversifying rural economies?

Author:
Killian, M.S. , Hady, T.F.
Subject:
employment , rural development , labor market , income , economic development , United States
Physical description:
p. 2-7.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives : Feb 1988. v. 4 (2)

10. What makes poverty so intractable in high--poverty nonmetro counties?

Author:
Morrissey, E.S.
Subject:
rural areas , poverty , employment , farm structure , income
Physical description:
p. 24-28.
Collection:
Rural Development Publications Collection
Series:
Rural development perspectives.
Part Of:
Rural development perspectives - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Feb 1986. v. 2 (2)