Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections

NALDC Record Details:

Yield gaps and yield relationships in Central U.S. soybean production systems

Permanent URL:
http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/58646
File:
Download [PDF File]
Abstract:
The magnitude of yield gaps (YG) (potential yield – farmer yield) provides some indication of the prospects for increasing crop yield to meet the food demands of future populations. Quantile regression analysis was applied to county soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] yields (1971 – 2011) from Kentucky, Iowa, and Nebraska (irrigated only) to estimate the attainable potential yield (APY) (yield in the most favorable environments in the 40-yr record). The YG for each year in each county was the difference between the APY and the county yield. There was substantial variation in the 40-yr mean county yields (186 to 335 g m-2) within and among states. The mean county APY within each state increased linearly (significant at p < 0.0001) in conjunction with mean county yields. The mean YGs varied from 9 to 24% of APY and were largest in the lowest yielding counties and they decreased linearly (p< 0.0001) as the mean county yield increased for each state. The large YGs in some counties were partially related to very low yields that occurred in some years during the 40-yr period. These YGs may partially reflect the ability of the soil to supply water to the crop. The difference between the maximum APY in each state and each county APY defined a second YG. The largest values ranged from 12 to 19% of the maximum APY. Irrigation should partially eliminate the first YG, but the second may be more intractable to the degree it is related to soil characteristics. These results suggest that soil conditions may play an important role in determining the size of YGs.
Author(s):
D. B. Egli , J. L. Hatfield
Subject(s):
Glycine max , crop yield , farmers , irrigated farming , irrigation , production technology , regression analysis , soil , soybeans , Iowa , Kentucky , Nebraska
Note:
USDA Scientist Submission
Source:
Agronomy Journal 2014 v.106 no.2
Language:
English
Year:
2014
Collection:
Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed
Rights:
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.