Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections

NALDC Record Details:

Enhanced efficiency fertilizers: Effect on nitrous oxide emissions in Iowa

Permanent URL:
http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/58645
File:
Download [PDF File]
Abstract:
Fertilizer application in crop production agriculture is as a major factor influencing soil emissions of the greenhouse gas N2O. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) have the potential to decrease N2O emissions by improving the synchrony between soil N supply and crop N demand. This study was done to compare the effects of soil N2O emissions from soil cropped to corn and EEFs and conventional fertilizers in. Over a two-year period growing season N2O emissions were quantified in unfertilized check plots and plots fertilized with UAN, UAN containing the urease and nitrification stabilizer AgrotainPlus (UAN+Ag), a stabilized urea containing urease and nitrification inhibitors (SuperU), and a slow release polymer coated urea (ESN). In the third year of the study conventional urea and an additional fertilizer formulation, Nutrisphere, were evaluated. We observed no reductions in cumulative seasonal N2O emissions from treatments fertilized with the EEFs in any of the study years. Generally, N2O emissions were significantly higher than emissions from the check (no fertilizer) treatment. There were no differences among fertilizer types except in 2009 when the ESN treatment had significantly higher emissions than the check, UAN, and UAN+Ag treatments. Our results indicate that, due to the episodic nature of N2O emissions induced by rainfall events, reduction of N2O emission through the use of EEFs may be limited in rain-fed regions.
Author(s):
Timothy B. Parkin , Jerry L. Hatfield
Subject(s):
crop production , fertilizer application , greenhouse gas emissions , growing season , nitrification inhibitors , nitrous oxide , rain , slow-release fertilizers , soil , urea , urea ammonium nitrate , urease inhibitors , Iowa
Note:
USDA Scientist Submission
Source:
Agronomy Journal 2014 v.106 no.2
Language:
English
Year:
2014
Collection:
Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed
Rights:
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.