Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections

NALDC Record Details:

Commentary: A critical assessment of the policy endorsement for holistic management

Permanent URL:
http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/58410
File:
Download [PDF File]
Abstract:
This commentary summarizes the evidence supporting holistic management (HM) and intensive rotational grazing (IRG) to demonstrate the extent to which Sherren and coauthors (2012) have overstated their policy endorsement of HM for rangeland application. Five major points are presented – distinction between HM and IRG, insufficient evaluation of the contradictory evidence, limitations of the experimental approach, additional costs associated with IRG, and heterogeneous capabilities and goals of graziers’ to manage intensive strategies – to justify why this policy endorsement is ill-advised. The vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon.
Author(s):
David D. Briske , Andrew J. Ash , Justin D. Derner , Lynn Huntsinger
Note:
USDA Scientist Submission
Source:
Agricultural systems March 2014 2014 March v.125
Language:
English
Publisher:
Elsevier Ltd
Year:
2014
Collection:
Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed
Rights:
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.