Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections

NALDC Record Details:

Designing Impact Assessments for Evaluating Ecological Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Streams

Permanent URL:
http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/34127
File:
Download [PDF File]
Abstract:
Conservation practices are regularly implemented within agricultural watersheds throughout the United States without evaluating their ecological impacts. Impact assessments documenting how habitat and aquatic biota within streams respond to these practices are needed for evaluating the effects of conservation practices. Numerous sampling protocols have been developed for monitoring streams. However, protocols designed for monitoring studies are not appropriate for impact assessments. We developed guiding principles for designing impact assessments of ecological responses to conservation practices. The guiding principles are as follows: (1) develop the hypothesis first, (2) use replicated experimental designs having controls and treatments, (3) assess the habitat and biological characteristics with quantitative and repeatable sampling methods, (4) use multiple sampling techniques for collecting aquatic organisms, and (5) standardize sampling efforts for aquatic organisms. The guiding principles were applied in designing a study intended to evaluate the influence of herbaceous riparian buffers on channelized headwater streams in central Ohio. Our example highlights that the application of our recommendations will result in impact assessments that are hypothesis-driven and incorporate quantitative methods for the measurement of abiotic and biotic attributes.
Author(s):
Smiley, Peter C. Jr. , Shields, F. Douglas Jr. , Knight, Scott S.
Subject(s):
conservation practices , environmental impact , ecosystems , streams , agricultural watersheds , habitats , sampling , guidelines , riparian buffers , aquatic organisms , Ohio , United States
Format:
p. 867-878.
Note:
Includes references
Source:
Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2009 Aug., v. 45, no. 4
Language:
English
Year:
2009
Collection:
Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed
Rights:
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.