Search National Agricultural Library Digital Collections

NALDC Record Details:

Heterotic Effects in Topcrosses of Modern and Obsolete Cotton Cultivars

Permanent URL:
http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/17572
File:
Download [PDF File]
Abstract:
Historically, reselection, pedigree, and mass-selection breeding methods have been used to develop open-pollinated cultivars of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). As a result, modern cotton cultivars should have accumulated additive genetic effects with time, while also possessing fewer nonadditive gene effects than obsolete cultivars. A topcross test was conducted to compare the heterotic effects of obsolete and modern cultivars for yield, yield components, and fiber quality. Significant differences were detected between heterosis values for the modern and obsolete cultivar groups for seed cotton yield, lint yield, lint percentage, and boll weight. No significant heterotic effects were detected for fiber quality. The obsolete group of cultivars showed average lint yield heterosis values of 34% compared with 23% for the modern cultivars. Both cultivar groups displayed significant, but similar heterosis values for the number of bolls per square meter (17 and 15%, respectively). The major yield component associated with lint yield heterosis for both groups was bolls per square meter, although boll weight heterosis also contributed to lint yield heterosis for the obsolete cultivars. Although modern cultivars produced considerable heterotic effects for yield, this study demonstrates that obsolete cultivars may provide an additional source of nonadditive genetic effects that can be exploited in a hybrid production system.
Author(s):
Campbell, B.T. , Bowman, D.T. , Weaver, D.B.
Subject(s):
Gossypium hirsutum , cotton , topcrossing , cultivars , temporal variation , genetic variation , heterosis , artificial selection , selection methods , open pollination , additive gene effects , crop yield , fiber quality , yield components , bolls
Format:
p. 593-600.
Note:
Includes references
Source:
Crop science 2008 Mar-Apr, v. 48, no. 2
Language:
English
Year:
2008
Collection:
Journal Articles, USDA Authors, Peer-Reviewed
Rights:
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.